Let's eat Cake

It started with shirts, now it's just stuff


Ask me anything  
Reblogged from comicremixes
comicremixes:

hasta la vista baby

comicremixes:

hasta la vista baby

Reblogged from personhoodusa
dippingstickssunshine:

personhoodusa:

http://ift.tt/1dTRasb

Which reason would you like?
1) The images are of medical procedures. It is socially inappropriate to publicly display photographs of medical procedures because frankly, they are unsettling. This is the same reason it is not socially acceptable to publicly display photographs of heart bypassses, lung transplants, tonsilectomies, or any other surgery because many people are made uncomfortable or ill by the sight of blood and tissue. Even cable television programs that show medical procedures (real or staged) are prefaced with a warning for viewer discretion.
2) The images are often photoshopped, mislabeled, or both. Some of the most common “pro-life” pictures of aborted fetuses originated when a group of “pro-life” activists trespassed on clinic property and went dumpster diving in medical waste. Because these “activists” were not doctors and had no biological training, they labeled their photographs with whatever gestational age they felt like, and these labels persist today. Another common tactic is taking a picture of an advanced fetus and photoshopping a small size reference, such as a quarter, to make it appear that early embryos are very developed and babylike.
3) The images are often not of abortions. “Pro-life” photographs of very, very late-term fetuses are virtually never the result of elective abortion. These pictures are often taken from case studies of rare and horrific fetal abnormalities published in medical journals. The parents of these children have lost very wanted pregnancies, and only gave their consent for the photographs to be used in medical journals for scientific purposes, hopefully so their child’s condition could be studied and remedied in future families. There are also cases of stillbirth photos being stolen from family blogs and medical websites for appropriation in the “pro-life” movement. Another common misappropriation is a photo of a whole embryo in its gestational sac, which was the result of a hysterectomy due to cancer.
4) The images are used in lieu of an actual discussion about medical rights. "Pro-life" organizations like Abolish Human Abortion and the Genocide Awareness Project claim they use these photographs to "start a discussion," but what they are really attempting to do is disgust the viewer into agreeing with them without even thinking about what abortion is and why people might choose it. When a neutral viewer is overwhelmed with thoughts of "ew, blood," it is difficult to consider the fact that a fetus does not have the right to use a woman’s body without her consent, or that all medical procedures are pretty gross and therefore irrelevant to the issue at hand.
That’s why I’m still pro-choice.

You can’t show pictures of Penises and Vaginas, but plenty of people are still pro genitalia

dippingstickssunshine:

personhoodusa:

http://ift.tt/1dTRasb

Which reason would you like?

1) The images are of medical procedures. It is socially inappropriate to publicly display photographs of medical procedures because frankly, they are unsettling. This is the same reason it is not socially acceptable to publicly display photographs of heart bypassses, lung transplants, tonsilectomies, or any other surgery because many people are made uncomfortable or ill by the sight of blood and tissue. Even cable television programs that show medical procedures (real or staged) are prefaced with a warning for viewer discretion.

2) The images are often photoshopped, mislabeled, or both. Some of the most common “pro-life” pictures of aborted fetuses originated when a group of “pro-life” activists trespassed on clinic property and went dumpster diving in medical waste. Because these “activists” were not doctors and had no biological training, they labeled their photographs with whatever gestational age they felt like, and these labels persist today. Another common tactic is taking a picture of an advanced fetus and photoshopping a small size reference, such as a quarter, to make it appear that early embryos are very developed and babylike.

3) The images are often not of abortions. “Pro-life” photographs of very, very late-term fetuses are virtually never the result of elective abortion. These pictures are often taken from case studies of rare and horrific fetal abnormalities published in medical journals. The parents of these children have lost very wanted pregnancies, and only gave their consent for the photographs to be used in medical journals for scientific purposes, hopefully so their child’s condition could be studied and remedied in future families. There are also cases of stillbirth photos being stolen from family blogs and medical websites for appropriation in the “pro-life” movement. Another common misappropriation is a photo of a whole embryo in its gestational sac, which was the result of a hysterectomy due to cancer.

4) The images are used in lieu of an actual discussion about medical rights. "Pro-life" organizations like Abolish Human Abortion and the Genocide Awareness Project claim they use these photographs to "start a discussion," but what they are really attempting to do is disgust the viewer into agreeing with them without even thinking about what abortion is and why people might choose it. When a neutral viewer is overwhelmed with thoughts of "ew, blood," it is difficult to consider the fact that a fetus does not have the right to use a woman’s body without her consent, or that all medical procedures are pretty gross and therefore irrelevant to the issue at hand.

That’s why I’m still pro-choice.

You can’t show pictures of Penises and Vaginas, but plenty of people are still pro genitalia

(via doodledumpling)


Reblogged from spooksthebun
doctormeow:

spooksthebun:

HOW THE FUCK DID MY KAZAAM LASERDISC BREAK



you have suffered a Shaq Attack

doctormeow:

spooksthebun:

HOW THE FUCK DID MY KAZAAM LASERDISC BREAK

you have suffered a Shaq Attack

(via commodoreskippy)

Reblogged from shinkuuma

(Source: shinkuuma, via tmntgifs)


Reblogged from ipoophere

chiisanatantei:

ipoophere:

wait

this speaks to me on an emotional level

(via darkboos)

Reblogged from all-hail-the-mighty-hiddlesconda

thorkitastic:

high-functioningfangirl:

Justice Finishing Pose by Thor & Loki (Thor the Dork World)
"I am the great Saiyaman!!!"

[x]

[x]

Thor and Loki watch Dragon Ball Z

(Source: all-hail-the-mighty-hiddlesconda, via commodoreskippy)

Reblogged from lookatalltheselfieolympics
princeass:

why do white people do things

Sometimes you win a bet, sometimes you lose

princeass:

why do white people do things

Sometimes you win a bet, sometimes you lose

(Source: lookatalltheselfieolympics, via darkboos)

Reblogged from wasabi-desu

emilyinthetardiswithcheekbones:

frizz01percy:

this should be the most reblogged post on tumblr before it dies

We need to reblog this so much that the post breaks

(Source: wasabi-desu, via doodledumpling)

Reblogged from rockindaydreaming
Reblogged from asylum-art

f-l-e-u-r-d-e-l-y-s:

Subodh Gupta: Everyday Objects

Subodh Gupta is an artist based in New Delhi, India. His work encompasses sculpture, installation, painting, photography, performance and video. Gupta chooses signature objects of the Indian sub-continent such as stainless steel cooking utensils and tiffin-boxes, and relocates them as art objects in monumental installations.

One of them is a horcrux Harry

(via darkboos)

Reblogged from
howtoskinatiger:

fleshcircus:

hang-the-bastard:

sfveganyogi:

Maggie Menu
On the menu for Maggie tonight is puréed sweet potato, puréed brown rice, sprouted organic tofu, chia seeds, and digestive enzymes. Does she look excited? She is!

This dog does not look excited, this dog looks malnourished.
The diet you are feeding your dog places a huge burden entirely on the pancreas, forcing it to produce large amounts of amylase to deal with the starch, cellulose, and carbohydrates in plant matter. (yes, even with your supplements) The carnivore’s pancreas does not secrete cellulase to split the cellulose into glucose molecules, nor have dogs become efficient at digesting and assimilating and utilizing plant material as a source of high quality protein. 
When this stuff sits in the pet’s intestine (yes even with your supplemented enzymes) it not only irritates the lining of the bowels but also provides the perfect warm, wet environment with plenty of undigested sugars and starches as food for bacteria. 
I respect your choice in leading a vegan lifestyle, but please do not force this on your pet who does not recognize the difference, your dog absolutely needs a healthier diet or it is going to develop health issues and I guarantee you, will not live as long as it could otherwise. 

fuckin animal abuse
your dog cannot be vegan you sick fuck
how can you even tag this as “vegan dog”, youre screaming to the world that you are knowingly depriving this dog of what it needs.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. This sort of thing should be illegal and people feeding dogs and cats vegan diets should be charged with animal cruelty (excluding for rare medical reasons.)  

show me the dog that willingly chooses that over a freshly prepared t bone steak sitting side by side, and you will have found the first vegan dog

howtoskinatiger:

fleshcircus:

hang-the-bastard:

sfveganyogi:

Maggie Menu

On the menu for Maggie tonight is puréed sweet potato, puréed brown rice, sprouted organic tofu, chia seeds, and digestive enzymes. Does she look excited? She is!

This dog does not look excited, this dog looks malnourished.

The diet you are feeding your dog places a huge burden entirely on the pancreas, forcing it to produce large amounts of amylase to deal with the starch, cellulose, and carbohydrates in plant matter. (yes, even with your supplements) The carnivore’s pancreas does not secrete cellulase to split the cellulose into glucose molecules, nor have dogs become efficient at digesting and assimilating and utilizing plant material as a source of high quality protein.

When this stuff sits in the pet’s intestine (yes even with your supplemented enzymes) it not only irritates the lining of the bowels but also provides the perfect warm, wet environment with plenty of undigested sugars and starches as food for bacteria.

I respect your choice in leading a vegan lifestyle, but please do not force this on your pet who does not recognize the difference, your dog absolutely needs a healthier diet or it is going to develop health issues and I guarantee you, will not live as long as it could otherwise.

fuckin animal abuse

your dog cannot be vegan you sick fuck

how can you even tag this as “vegan dog”, youre screaming to the world that you are knowingly depriving this dog of what it needs.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. This sort of thing should be illegal and people feeding dogs and cats vegan diets should be charged with animal cruelty (excluding for rare medical reasons.)  

show me the dog that willingly chooses that over a freshly prepared t bone steak sitting side by side, and you will have found the first vegan dog

(Source: , via doodledumpling)

This is hilarious!

I am the ass crack bandit, humans make better banks than piggies, whenever I get more change at the store, I can’t wait to drop it down your butts, I think I will go to the bank and get so much change, and take all my dollars and make them into change and drop it all down there. The Ass Crack Bandit, identity unknown, Community S05E03